Sekona v. Custino, et al.
Filing
73
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/27/18 ADOPTING 67 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING 71 Motion to dismiss and DENYING 60 Motion for injunctive relief. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ETUATE SEKONA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-CV-0517-JAM-CMK-P
v.
ORDER
F. CUSTINO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42
17
18
U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern
19
District of California local rules.
On July 20, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections
22
within a specified time. The Magistrate Judge has recommended dismissal of Charon and Angle
23
as defendants to this action, as well as denial of plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief. While
24
plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations, he has filed a motion
25
requesting voluntary dismissal of defendants Charon and Angle.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
26
27
supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis.
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The findings and recommendations filed July 20, 2018, are adopted in full;
3
2.
Plaintiff’s motion for voluntary dismissal of defendant Charon and Angle
4
5
6
7
(Doc. 71) is granted;
3.
Defendants Charon and Angle are dismissed and this action shall proceed
as against defendants Custino and Snow; and
4.
Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (Doc. 60) is denied.
8
9
10
DATED: September 27, 2018
/s/ John A. Mendez
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?