Sullivan v. Macomber et al
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/15/2017 DENYING 7 Motion to Appoint Counsel without prejudice. (Hunt, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
COREY SULLIVAN,
11
12
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-0526 DB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
JEFF MACOMBER, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action, has requested
17
appointment of counsel on the grounds that he is indigent, his incarceration limits his ability to
18
litigate this case, and the issues involved are complex.
19
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require
20
counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490
21
U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the district court may request the
22
voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d
23
1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990).
24
The test for exceptional circumstances requires the court to evaluate the plaintiff’s
25
likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in
26
light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. See Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328,
27
1331 (9th Cir. 1986); Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Circumstances
28
common to most prisoners, such as lack of legal education and limited law library access, do not
1
1
establish exceptional circumstances that would warrant a request for voluntary assistance of
2
counsel. In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of
4
counsel (ECF No. 7) is denied, without prejudice.
5
Dated: October 15, 2017
6
7
8
9
/DLB;
DB/Inbox/Routine/sull0526.31
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?