Anderson v. Sacramento Police Department et al

Filing 4

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/13/16 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROBERT PAUL ANDERSON,

12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:16-cv-0527 TLN GGH PS

Plaintiff,
v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

SACRAMENTO POLICE
DEPARTMENT, et al.,
Defendants.

17
18

By order filed June 2, 2016, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and twenty-eight days

19

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. In that order, the court informed plaintiff of the

20

deficiencies in his complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not

21

filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

22

Plaintiff has apparently decided to rest on the dismissed complaint. For the reasons given

23

in the June 2, 2016, order, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed with

24

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

25

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

26

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

27

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

28

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings
1

1

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

3

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

4

Dated: July 13, 2016

5

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

6

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9

GGH:076/Anderson0527.fta

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2