Thomas v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.

Filing 13

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 3/17/17 ORDERING that this case is REMANDED to the Superior Court of Sacramento. Certified copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VICTORIA THOMAS, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:16-cv-00531-MCE-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER THE PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, INC. and Does 1–50, inclusive, 16 Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff originally filed this suit in the Superior Court of Sacramento on January 19 25, 2016. Not. of Removal, ECF No. 1, ¶ 1. It was removed to this Court on March 11, 20 2016, pursuant to the Court’s federal question jurisdiction, as Plaintiff’s Complaint 21 included a claim under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601– 22 2654. Plaintiff now moves to amend her complaint so that she can remove her federal 23 cause of action and to remand the case back to the Superior Court of Sacramento. ECF 24 No. 8. Plaintiffs have provided a declaration stating that the parties “reached an 25 agreement to allow Plaintiff to dismiss her FMLA claim and have the matter remanded to 26 the Sacramento County Superior Court.” Decl. of Keith D. Cable, ECF No. 9, ¶ 4. And 27 indeed, Defendants have filed a Statement of Non-Opposition to Plaintiff’s motion. ECF 28 No. 11. 1 1 Under Eastern District of California Local Rule 137(c), a proposed amended 2 complaint should have been attached to Plaintiff’s Motion. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion 3 and Defendant’s Statement of Non-Opposition are construed as a stipulation to remand. 4 Therefore, the Court orders that this case be REMANDED to the Superior Court of 5 Sacramento. In light of the foregoing, the hearing set for March 23, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. is 6 VACATED. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 17, 2017 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?