Dennis v. Kerman et al
Filing
109
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/28/2021 GRANTING 107 & 108 Motions for Clarification. (Rodriguez, E)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
MATTHEW DENNIS,
11
12
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-0542 JAM AC P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
SCOTT KERNAN, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed two requests for clarification
17
regarding the proper way to refer to documents that have already been filed with the court. ECF
18
Nos. 107, 108. Plaintiff is advised that the example he provides in his second request, which
19
identifies the document by its ECF No. and page numbers, is an acceptable way to cite to
20
documents on the record. Plaintiff is further advised that the court does not have the resources to
21
regularly respond to requests related to formatting and procedure, and should he file any similar
22
requests they will likely be disregarded. The court is aware of plaintiff’s status as a pro se
23
prisoner and will consider it as appropriate when reviewing plaintiff’s filings.
24
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions for clarification, ECF
25
Nos. 107, 108, are GRANTED to the extent set forth above.
26
DATED: May 28, 2021
27
28
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
