Gibbs v. Bradford et al
Filing
43
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 5/26/2020 ADOPTING 42 Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING 36 Motion "to keep lawsuit against the defendants, "construed as motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b).(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KENNETH G. GIBBS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-0544-MCE-EFB P
v.
ORDER
J.R. BRADFORD, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On April 9, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 42. Neither party
23
has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
28
1. The findings and recommendations filed April 9, 2020, ECF No. 42, are ADOPTED in
full; and
1
1
2
3
4
2. Plaintiff’s motion “to keep lawsuit against the defendants,” construed as motion for
relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b), ECF No. 36, is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 26, 2020
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?