Daniels v. Arnold

Filing 58

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/7/2020 ADOPTING 27 Findings and Recommendations in full; DISMISSING defendants M. Dela Vega, Dr. Ashley J. Mulligan-Pfile, J. Lewis, and Eric Arnold and putative defendants Dr. Santiago, Dr. Robert Menende, Dr. Pablo C. Chan, Dr. An Minh Nguyen, Dr. Naz, Dr. Goertz, Dr. Collinsworth, Dr. Khatri Dave, Dr. Ruddy, Dr. Von Lintig and Dr. Arthur Blain. J. Lewis, Ashley J. Mulligan, Eric Arnold and M. De La Vega terminated. This action will proceed against sole defendant Dr. Lotersztain on plaintiff's 8th Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to plaintiff's serious medical needs. This case is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-00551-KJM-AC Document 58 Filed 09/08/20 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TED DARNELL DANIELS, 12 No. 2:16-cv-0551 KJM AC P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 ORDER ERIC ARNOLD, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 19 by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On July 31, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 21 served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the 23 findings and recommendations.1 24 ///// 25 ///// 26 27 28 1 In addition to his substantive objections, plaintiff clarifies that he filed his First Amended Complaint while incarcerated in the Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (SATF) at California State Prison Corcoran (CSP-COR), not while incarcerated at CSP-COR itself. ECF No. 32. 1 Case 2:16-cv-00551-KJM-AC Document 58 Filed 09/08/20 Page 2 of 2 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 2 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 3 findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 5 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 31, 2019, are adopted in full. 6 2. The following defendants are dismissed from this action: 7 A. Defendants M. Dela Vega, R.N. (CSP-SOL Supervising Head Nurse), Dr. 8 Ashley J. Mulligan-Pfile (CDCR Chief Medical Executive), J. Lewis (CDCR Deputy Director for 9 Inmate Appeals), and Eric Arnold (former CSP-SOL Warden); and 10 B. Putative defendants Dr. Santiago, Dr. Robert Menende, Dr. Pablo C. Chan, Dr. 11 An Minh Nguyen, Dr. Naz, Dr. Goertz, Dr. Collinsworth, Dr. Khatri Dave, Dr. Ruddy, Dr. Von 12 Lintig and Dr. Arthur Blain. 13 3. This action will proceed against sole defendant Dr. Lotersztain on plaintiff’s Eighth 14 Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to plaintiff’s serious medical needs, as set forth in 15 the First Amended Complaint. 16 4. This case is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial 17 proceedings. 18 DATED: September 7, 2020. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?