Allen v. Hughes
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/11/2016 ORDERING, within 21 days, petitioner shall file either an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of no opposition. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action.(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KAREN FRANCES ALLEN,
12
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-560-GEB-EFB P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
KIMBERLY HUGHES, Warden,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to
18
28 U.S.C. § 2254. On July 12, 2016, respondent filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds that the
19
petition was filed beyond the one-year statute of limitations contained in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d).
20
Petitioner has not filed an opposition or a statement of no opposition to respondent’s motion to
21
dismiss.
22
A responding party’s failure “to file an opposition or to file a statement of no opposition
23
may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may result in the
24
imposition of sanctions.” L. R. 230(l). Failure to comply with any order or with the Local Rules
25
“may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or
26
Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.” L. R. 110. The court may dismiss this action
27
with or without prejudice, as appropriate, if a party disobeys an order or the Local Rules. See
28
Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1263 (9th Cir. 1992) (district court did not abuse discretion in
1
1
dismissing pro se plaintiff’s complaint for failing to obey an order to re-file an amended
2
complaint to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439,
3
1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988) (dismissal for pro se plaintiff’s failure to comply with local rule
4
regarding notice of change of address affirmed).
5
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that, within 21 days of the date of this order,
6
petitioner shall file either an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of no opposition.
7
Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action.
8
Dated: August 11, 2016.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?