Van den Heuvel v. Expedia Travel et al
Filing
31
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 08/25/2016 ORDERING pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the FRCP, the Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice as to Defendant British Airways, PLC ONLY (and not as to Defendant Expedia, which shall remain as a defendant in the case), with each side to bear its own respective attorneys' fees and costs. (Jackson, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-SACRAMENTO DIVISION
10
11
12
JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL,
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
15 EXPEDIA TRAVEL, BRITISH AIRWAYS
AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5,
16
Defendants.
17
Case No. 2:16-CV-00567-JAM-AC
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND
ORDER
[FRCP 41]
Complaint Filed:
January 25, 2016
Trial Date:
None set
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Plaintiff Jean Mac Van Den Heuvel and Defendant British Airways, PLC hereby agree
and stipulate as follows:
Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Second
Amended Complaint should be dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant British Airways, PLC
only (and not as to Defendant Expedia, which shall remain as a defendant in the case), with each
side to bear its own respective attorneys’ fees and costs.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
9
10
Dated: August 24, 2016
By:___/s/____________________________
JEAN MARC VAN DE HEAVEL
Plaintiff In Pro Per
Dated: August 24, 2016
LECLAIRRYAN, LLP
11
12
13
14
By:___/s/____________________________
MATTHEW J. RUGGLES
15
16
Attorneys for Defendant
BRITISH AIRWAYS, PLC
17
ORDER
18
19
20
Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice, IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
23
Dated: _8/25/2016
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?