Van den Heuvel v. Expedia Travel et al

Filing 31

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 08/25/2016 ORDERING pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the FRCP, the Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice as to Defendant British Airways, PLC ONLY (and not as to Defendant Expedia, which shall remain as a defendant in the case), with each side to bear its own respective attorneys' fees and costs. (Jackson, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-SACRAMENTO DIVISION 10 11 12 JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, Plaintiff, 13 14 v. 15 EXPEDIA TRAVEL, BRITISH AIRWAYS AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5, 16 Defendants. 17 Case No. 2:16-CV-00567-JAM-AC STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER [FRCP 41] Complaint Filed: January 25, 2016 Trial Date: None set 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff Jean Mac Van Den Heuvel and Defendant British Airways, PLC hereby agree and stipulate as follows: Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Second Amended Complaint should be dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant British Airways, PLC only (and not as to Defendant Expedia, which shall remain as a defendant in the case), with each side to bear its own respective attorneys’ fees and costs. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 9 10 Dated: August 24, 2016 By:___/s/____________________________ JEAN MARC VAN DE HEAVEL Plaintiff In Pro Per Dated: August 24, 2016 LECLAIRRYAN, LLP 11 12 13 14 By:___/s/____________________________ MATTHEW J. RUGGLES 15 16 Attorneys for Defendant BRITISH AIRWAYS, PLC 17 ORDER 18 19 20 Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice, IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 23 Dated: _8/25/2016 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?