Adams v. People of the State of California

Filing 30

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 6/5/2019 ORDERING plaintiff shall promptly seek additional information sufficient to effect service on any unserved defendants and notify the court once such information is ascertained. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CURTIS EARNEST ADAMS, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:16-CV-0569-TLN-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOHN R. SONGS, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 19, 2019, the court ordered the United States Marshal to serve 19 the complaint on defendants. Process directed to defendant H. Given and John R. Songs was 20 returned unexecuted because there is no record of H. Given or John R. Songs. Plaintiff must 21 provide additional information to serve this defendant. Plaintiff shall promptly seek such 22 information through discovery, the California Public Records Act, Cal. Gov't. Code § 6250, et 23 seq., or other means available to plaintiff. If access to the required information is denied or 24 unreasonably delayed, plaintiff may seek judicial intervention. Once additional information 25 sufficient to effect service is obtained, plaintiff shall notify the court whereupon plaintiff will be 26 forwarded the forms necessary for service by the U.S. Marshal. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure 27 to effect service may result in the dismissal of unserved defendants. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). 28 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall promptly seek 2 additional information sufficient to effect service on any unserved defendants and notify the court 3 once such information is ascertained. 4 5 6 Dated: June 5, 2019 ____________________________________ DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?