Frisella v. Bisla et al.

Filing 48

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/15/2020. The Clerk of Court shall enter default against Harwinder Bisla; and Harwinder Bisla's answer is STRICKEN. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KAYLA FRISELLA, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-0586 CKD v. ORDER HARWINDER BISLA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 The present case has been continually delayed due to defendant Harwinder Bisla’s failure 18 19 to respond to court orders. On August 21, 2019, defendant did not appear for a final pretrial 20 conference in this matter and did not file a joint status report, as ordered by the court, and the 21 court subsequently ordered defendant to show cause as to why sanctions, such as default and 22 having his answer stricken, should not be entered. (ECF No. 44.) The court ordered reservice of 23 this order to show cause to a new address defendant listed and to his email. (ECF No. 45.) 24 Defendant again failed to respond to this order or contact the court in any way. At this point, the court concludes that the appropriate sanctions are for default to be 25 26 entered and defendant’s answer be stricken. 27 //// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Clerk of Court shall enter default against Harwinder Bisla; and 3 2. Harwinder Bisla’s answer is STRICKEN. 4 Dated: January 15, 2020 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 16/16-586.Frisella v. Bisla. default 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?