Frisella v. Bisla et al.
Filing
48
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/15/2020. The Clerk of Court shall enter default against Harwinder Bisla; and Harwinder Bisla's answer is STRICKEN. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KAYLA FRISELLA, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-0586 CKD
v.
ORDER
HARWINDER BISLA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
The present case has been continually delayed due to defendant Harwinder Bisla’s failure
18
19
to respond to court orders. On August 21, 2019, defendant did not appear for a final pretrial
20
conference in this matter and did not file a joint status report, as ordered by the court, and the
21
court subsequently ordered defendant to show cause as to why sanctions, such as default and
22
having his answer stricken, should not be entered. (ECF No. 44.) The court ordered reservice of
23
this order to show cause to a new address defendant listed and to his email. (ECF No. 45.)
24
Defendant again failed to respond to this order or contact the court in any way.
At this point, the court concludes that the appropriate sanctions are for default to be
25
26
entered and defendant’s answer be stricken.
27
////
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The Clerk of Court shall enter default against Harwinder Bisla; and
3
2. Harwinder Bisla’s answer is STRICKEN.
4
Dated: January 15, 2020
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
16/16-586.Frisella v. Bisla. default
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?