Gil v. Spalding et al

Filing 41

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/26/2017 GRANTING 40 Request for Extension of Time. Defendants have up to an including 7/24/2017 to serve responses to Plaintiff's discovery requests. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARMANDO GIL, Case No. 2:16-cv-0587 GEB KJN P 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 15 S. SPALDING, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 The Court, having considered Defendants Green and Spalding’s motion for a thirty-day 19 extension of time to allow Defendants to respond to Plaintiff’s discovery requests, and good cause 20 appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 21 1. Defendants’ request for an extension of time to serve their responses to Plaintiff’s first 22 set of interrogatories, requests for admission, and requests for production of documents (ECF No. 23 40) is granted. 24 2. Defendants have up to and including July 24, 2017, to serve their responses to Plaintiff’s 25 discovery requests. 26 Dated: June 26, 2017 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?