Gil v. Spalding et al

Filing 42

ORDER adopting in full 39 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 6/30/17. Plaintiff's request to strike defendants' 36 answer is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

ARMANDO GILL,

7
8
9

No. 2:16-cv-0587 GEB KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

S. SPAULDING, et al.,

10

Defendants.

11
12

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

13

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

14

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

15

On June 07, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

16

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

17

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed

18

objections to the findings and recommendations.

19

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

20

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

21

ORDERED that:

22

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 07, 2017, are adopted in full;

23

2. Plaintiff’s request to strike defendants’ answer (ECF No. 36) is denied.

24

Dated: June 30, 2017

25
26
27
28
1