Gil v. Spalding et al

Filing 42

ORDER adopting in full 39 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 6/30/17. Plaintiff's request to strike defendants' 36 answer is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 ARMANDO GILL, 7 8 9 No. 2:16-cv-0587 GEB KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER S. SPAULDING, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 12 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 13 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 14 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 15 On June 07, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 16 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 17 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 18 objections to the findings and recommendations. 19 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 20 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 21 ORDERED that: 22 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 07, 2017, are adopted in full; 23 2. Plaintiff’s request to strike defendants’ answer (ECF No. 36) is denied. 24 Dated: June 30, 2017 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?