Gil v. Spalding et al
Filing
55
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/07/17 ORDERING that within 21 days from the date of this order, defendants shall provide the documentary evidence described above. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ARMANDO GIL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-0587 GEB KJN P
v.
ORDER
S. SPAULDING, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. In support of defendants’ motion for
18
summary judgment, appeals coordinator Clark declares that any delay in processing mail in
19
August of 2015 would have been recorded “in order for an appeal not to be canceled as
20
untimely,” and no such delay was recorded. (ECF No. 43-3 at 4.) Defendants provided no
21
documentary evidence to support such statement. It is unclear whether prison staff maintain a log
22
concerning delayed mail that might show a gap in time where no delay in August 2015 was
23
recorded, or what documentary evidence Clark reviewed in order to make such statement about
24
mail delivery.
25
It is also unclear whether plaintiff’s mail log may reflect his receipt of the second level
26
review.
27
////
28
1
1
Good cause appearing, defendants shall submit to the court any log or other documentary
2
evidence for the time frame August 17, 2015, through September 29, 2015, that may or may not
3
reflect a delay in mail from the appeals office to plaintiff or other prisoners housed with plaintiff,
4
as well as a copy of plaintiff’s mail log for the time frame August 17, 2015, through September
5
29, 2015.
6
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days from the date of
7
this order, defendants shall provide the documentary evidence described above.
8
Dated: November 7, 2017
9
10
11
gil0587.log
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?