Gil v. Spalding et al

Filing 55

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/07/17 ORDERING that within 21 days from the date of this order, defendants shall provide the documentary evidence described above. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARMANDO GIL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-0587 GEB KJN P v. ORDER S. SPAULDING, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. In support of defendants’ motion for 18 summary judgment, appeals coordinator Clark declares that any delay in processing mail in 19 August of 2015 would have been recorded “in order for an appeal not to be canceled as 20 untimely,” and no such delay was recorded. (ECF No. 43-3 at 4.) Defendants provided no 21 documentary evidence to support such statement. It is unclear whether prison staff maintain a log 22 concerning delayed mail that might show a gap in time where no delay in August 2015 was 23 recorded, or what documentary evidence Clark reviewed in order to make such statement about 24 mail delivery. 25 It is also unclear whether plaintiff’s mail log may reflect his receipt of the second level 26 review. 27 //// 28 1 1 Good cause appearing, defendants shall submit to the court any log or other documentary 2 evidence for the time frame August 17, 2015, through September 29, 2015, that may or may not 3 reflect a delay in mail from the appeals office to plaintiff or other prisoners housed with plaintiff, 4 as well as a copy of plaintiff’s mail log for the time frame August 17, 2015, through September 5 29, 2015. 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days from the date of 7 this order, defendants shall provide the documentary evidence described above. 8 Dated: November 7, 2017 9 10 11 gil0587.log 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?