Starr v. United States et al
Filing
15
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/15/16 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. U.S. District Judge Morrison C. England Jr. randomly assigned to this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M) Modified on 11/16/2016 (Plummer, M).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBIN GILLEN STARR,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:16-cv-0589 AC P
Petitioner,
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
v.
UNITED STATES, et al.,
Respondents.
16
17
By an order filed October 6, 2016, petitioner was ordered to file a completed in forma
18
pauperis affidavit and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that
19
this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded
20
to the court’s order and has not filed the required document.
21
In addition to failing to comply with the court’s October 6, 2016 order, petitioner has
22
refused multiple mailings from the court. The October 6, 2016 order was served on petitioner’s
23
address of record and returned by the postal service with the notation that delivery had been
24
refused. The order was re-served on petitioner’s address of record on October 26, 2016 and has
25
not been returned. Petitioner is informed that refusal of court orders does not obviate his
26
responsibility to prosecute this action and comply with court orders.
27
28
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is
directed to assign a district judge to this case; and
1
1
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
2
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
3
assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty one days
4
after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written
5
objections with the court. Such document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s
6
Findings and Recommendations.” Local Rule 304(d). Petitioner is advised that failure to file
7
objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order.
8
Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
9
DATED: November 15, 2016
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?