Patterson v. The City of Vallejo California et al
Filing
7
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/17/2016 DENYING plaintiff's 6 motion to issue summons; and the Clerk shall assign a district judge to this action. IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BRYAN PATTERSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:16-cv-0595 CKD P
v.
ORDER &
THE CITY OF VALLEJO CALIFORNIA,
et al.,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner, commenced this action in March 2016. On March 29, 2016, the
18
court ordered him to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee for this
19
action. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff submitted a request to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 4);
20
however, it was incomplete. On April 11, 2016, the court directed him to file “a certified copy of
21
his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the
22
complaint and obtain[] the certification required” within thirty days, or face dismissal of this
23
action. (ECF No. 5.) The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not submitted the
24
required documents. Thus the undersigned will recommend that this action be dismissed without
25
prejudice.
26
////
27
////
28
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. Plaintiff’s motion to issue summons (ECF No. 6) is denied; and
3
2. The Clerk of Court shall assign a district judge to this action.
4
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See
5
Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
6
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
7
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
8
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
9
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
10
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
11
objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The
12
parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
13
appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
14
Dated: May 17, 2016
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
2 / patt0595.fifp
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?