Huskins et al. v. City of Vallejo et al.

Filing 29

ORDER granting 22 Motion for leave to notice two separate depositions signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/20/17. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DENISE HUSKINS and AARON QUINN, 11 12 13 14 15 No. 2:16-cv-603-TLN-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF VALLEJO, a public entity, KENNY PARK, MATHEW MUSTARD, and DOES 1-25, Defendants. 16 17 The case was before the court on January 18, 2016, for hearing on plaintiffs’ motion for 18 leave to notice two separate depositions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) 19 directed at defendant City of Vallejo. ECF No. 22. Attorney Brady Dewar appeared on behalf of 20 plaintiffs; Assistant City Attorney Wendy Motooka appeared on behalf of the City of Vallejo. 21 For the reasons stated on the record, plaintiffs’ motion is granted. Plaintiffs may depose 22 the City of Vallejo’s person or persons most knowledgeable on the topics detailed in the notice of 23 deposition filed as Exhibit H to the Declaration of Kevin Clune. See ECF No. 27-1 at 47-50. 24 Completing that initial deposition will not preclude plaintiffs from noticing a second deposition 25 covering other topics. 26 So Ordered. 27 DATED: January 20, 2017. 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?