Carvalho v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Filing
10
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/19/2016 ORDERING that Defendant's 4 Motion to Dismiss is CONTINUED to 7/14/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley.(Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
Alexander W. Munn, Esq. (166915)
awmunn@bpelaw.com
BPE LAW GROUP, PC
2339 Gold Meadow Way, Suite 101
Gold River, CA 95670
Tel. 916.966.2260
Fax 916.346.4880
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
K.C. CARVALHO
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
K.C. CARVALHO, an Individual,
Plaintiff,
12
13
vs.
14
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; and DOES 1
through 25,
15
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: CASE 2:16-CV-00618-TLN-EFB
Assigned to Hon. Troy L. Nunley
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING
DATE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
DISMISS
Continued Hearing Date: June 2, 2016
Time:
2:00 p.m.
Ctrm:
2, 15th Floor
Stipulated Date:
Time:
Ctrm:
July 14, 2016
2:00 p.m.
2, 15th Floor
The Parties hereby STIPULATE that Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.’s Motion to
23
24
Dismiss, currently to be heard on June 2, 2016, be continued to July 14, 2016.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED.
25
26
///
27
///
28
///
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE
CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-00618-TLN-EFB
1
Respectfully Submitted,
2
BPE LAW GROUP, P.C.
3
4
Dated: May 18, 2016
5
6
By: /s/ Alexander W. Munn
Alexander W. Munn, Esq.
awmunn@bpelaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
K.C. Carvalho
7
8
Respectfully Submitted,
9
ANGLIN, FLEWELLING, RASMUSSEN,
CAMPBELL & TRYTTEN LLP
10
11
Dated: May 18, 2016
12
13
By: /s/ David M. Newman (approved on May 18, 2016)
David M. Newman, Esq.
dnewman@afrct.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Wells Fargo, N.A.
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
18
19
Dated: May 19, 2016
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE
CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-00618-TLN-EFB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?