Carvalho v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Filing
7
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 04/19/16 ORDERING that the hearing on the 4 Motion to Dismiss is RESET to 6/2/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Benson, A)
1
2
3
4
Alexander W. Munn, Esq. (166915)
awmunn@bpelaw.com
BPE LAW GROUP, PC
2339 Gold Meadow Way, Suite 101
Gold River, CA 95670
Tel. 916.966.2260
Fax 916.346.4880
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
K.C. CARVALHO
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
K.C. CARVALHO, an Individual,
Plaintiff,
12
13
vs.
14
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; and DOES 1
through 25,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
Case No.: CASE 2:16-CV-00618-TLN-EFB
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING
DATE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
DISMISS, AND ORDER
Original Hearing Date:
Time:
Ctrm:
May 5, 2016
2:00 p.m.
2, 15th Floor
Stipulated Date:
Time:
Ctrm:
June 2, 2016
2:00 p.m.
2, 15th Floor
Assigned to: Hon. Troy L. Nunley
The Parties hereby STIPULATE that Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.’s Motion to
22
23
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Dismiss, currently to be heard on May 5, 2016, be continued to Thursday, June 2, 2016.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED.
24
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE, ORDER
CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-00618-TLN-EFB
1
Respectfully Submitted,
2
BPE LAW GROUP, P.C.
3
4
Dated: April 18, 2016
5
6
By: /s/ Alexander W. Munn
Alexander W. Munn, Esq.
awmunn@bpelaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
K.C. Carvalho
7
8
Respectfully Submitted,
9
ANGLIN, FLEWELLING, RASMUSSEN,
CAMPBELL & TRYTTEN LLP
10
11
Dated:___________________
12
13
By: /s/ David M. Newman (approved on April 14, 2016)
David M. Newman, Esq.
dnewman@afrct.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Wells Fargo, N.A.
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED,
16
17
Dated: April 19, 2016
18
19
20
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE, ORDER
CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-00618-TLN-EFB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?