Carvalho v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 7

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 04/19/16 ORDERING that the hearing on the 4 Motion to Dismiss is RESET to 6/2/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Alexander W. Munn, Esq. (166915) awmunn@bpelaw.com BPE LAW GROUP, PC 2339 Gold Meadow Way, Suite 101 Gold River, CA 95670 Tel. 916.966.2260 Fax 916.346.4880 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff K.C. CARVALHO 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 K.C. CARVALHO, an Individual, Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. 14 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; and DOES 1 through 25, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 Case No.: CASE 2:16-CV-00618-TLN-EFB STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND ORDER Original Hearing Date: Time: Ctrm: May 5, 2016 2:00 p.m. 2, 15th Floor Stipulated Date: Time: Ctrm: June 2, 2016 2:00 p.m. 2, 15th Floor Assigned to: Hon. Troy L. Nunley The Parties hereby STIPULATE that Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.’s Motion to 22 23 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Dismiss, currently to be heard on May 5, 2016, be continued to Thursday, June 2, 2016. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED. 24 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE, ORDER CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-00618-TLN-EFB 1 Respectfully Submitted, 2 BPE LAW GROUP, P.C. 3 4 Dated: April 18, 2016 5 6 By: /s/ Alexander W. Munn Alexander W. Munn, Esq. awmunn@bpelaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff K.C. Carvalho 7 8 Respectfully Submitted, 9 ANGLIN, FLEWELLING, RASMUSSEN, CAMPBELL & TRYTTEN LLP 10 11 Dated:___________________ 12 13 By: /s/ David M. Newman (approved on April 14, 2016) David M. Newman, Esq. dnewman@afrct.com Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo, N.A. 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED, 16 17 Dated: April 19, 2016 18 19 20 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE, ORDER CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-00618-TLN-EFB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?