Palma v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al.

Filing 15

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/19/2016 ORDERING The court GRANTS in PART and DENIES in PART the parties' Stipulated Request 14 ; Plaintiff shall file a first amended complaint no later than 6/6/2016; Motion 11 to Dis miss, and Motion 9 to Remand is RESET to 7/29/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; the parties' request to extend the time for defendants to respond to plaintiff's intended first amended complaint is DENIED without prejudice; the parties may renew such a request upon plaintiff's filing of the first amended complaint.(Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

THOMAS A. WOODS (SB #210050)
[e-mail]
BRYAN L. HAWKINS (SB #238346)
[e-mail]
STOEL RIVES LLP
500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1600
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. and
NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING
CORPORATION

8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
RAY PALMA,

CASE NO. 2:16-cv-00633-KJM-CKD

12
Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
REQUEST TO CONTINUE JUNE 3,
2016 HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO REMAND AND TO
EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
INTENDED FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT

13
v.
14
15

SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.;
NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING
CORPORATION, and Does 1 through 20,

16
Defendant.
17
18
19

ORDER
20
The court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the parties’ Stipulated Request
21
(ECF No. 14), as follows:
22
1.

Plaintiff shall file a first amended complaint no later than June 6, 2016.

2.

The June 3, 2016 hearing on plaintiff’s motion to remand (ECF No. 9) and

23
24
defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 11) is RESET for July 29, 2016 at 10:00
25

AM in Courtroom 3 before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller.1

26
27
1

28

The parties requested the hearing be reset for July 8, 2016, but July 8 is not a law and motion calendar date. July 29
is the next available hearing date.

-1-

S TOEL R IVES LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SACRAMENTO

[PROPOSED] ORDER
86634355.1 0052161-02673

1

3.

The parties’ request to extend the time for defendants to respond to plaintiff’s

2

intended first amended complaint is DENIED without prejudice. The parties may

3

renew such a request upon plaintiff’s filing of the first amended complaint.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5

Dated: May 19, 2016

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

S TOEL R IVES LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SACRAMENTO

[PROPOSED] ORDER
86634355.1 0052161-02673