Schrupp v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al.
Filing
50
PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/8/2018 ORDERING Stipulated protective APPROVED; Amendments and Clarifications: The parties shall comply with the provisions and procedures of Local Rules 140 and 141 with respect to s ealing or redaction requests; Prior to filing any motion related to this stipulated protective order or other discovery motion, the parties shall first exhaust informal meet-and-confer efforts and otherwise comply with Local Rule 251; Pursuant to Local Rule 141.1(f), the court will not retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of this stipulated protective order after the action is terminated. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
12
PAUL SCHRUPP, an individual,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
Case No. 2:16-cv-00636-WBS-KJN
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; NDEX
WEST, L.L.C.; and DOES 1 through 20
inclusive,
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
The Court, having read and considered the Stipulated Protective Order by and between
21
Plaintiff, PAUL SCHRUPP, and Defendant, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., (collectively, the
22
“Parties”) (collectively, the “Parties”), and good cause appearing therefore, hereby enters the joint
23
protective order as follows:
24
1.
The parties stipulate to a protective order regarding policies and procedures
25
documents produced by Wells Fargo which shall be used solely for discovery, preparation for trial,
26
trial, and any appeal of this Action, and shall not be disclosed to anyone outside this litigation;
27
28
2.
The protective order does not preclude either party from submitting such documents
or information in a court filing in this litigation, provided that at least seven (7) days’ notice of
93000/BR1883/01984914-1
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
such an intended filing is provided to the opposing party, who can then seek any appropriate relief
2
from the court if necessary;
3
4
5
6
3.
The documents may not be used in any future action unless independently obtained
through discovery; and
4.
The protective order shall remain in full force and effect until modified, superseded
or terminated by further order of the Court.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED, with the following amendments and clarifications:
9
10
11
1. The parties shall comply with the provisions and procedures of Local Rules 140 and
141 with respect to sealing or redaction requests.
12
13
2. Prior to filing any motion related to this stipulated protective order or other discovery
14
motion, the parties shall first exhaust informal meet-and-confer efforts and otherwise
15
comply with Local Rule 251.
16
17
18
19
3. Pursuant to Local Rule 141.1(f), the court will not retain jurisdiction over enforcement
of the terms of this stipulated protective order after the action is terminated.
Dated: March 8, 2018
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
93000/BR1883/01984914-1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?