Brown v. Jewell et al

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/24/16 ORDERING that the date of the status conference and the date for filing status reports shall remain the same as set forth in the 8/12/2016 order. ECF No. 14 . Defendant's responsive pleading is due 9/12/2016. ECF No. 12 . (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MARILEE BROWN,

12
13
14

No. 2:16-cv-0637 MCE CKD PS

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

SALLY JEWELL,

15

Defendant.

16
17

Plaintiff has filed an opposition to defendant’s ex parte application for extension of time.

18

The opposition was filed after the court granted the extension. The court will therefore construe

19

plaintiff’s opposition as a motion to reconsider. Upon review of plaintiff’s opposition and

20

defendant’s reply, the court finds no reason to modify the extension previously granted.

21

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

22

1. The date of the status conference and the date for filing status reports shall remain the

23
24
25

same as set forth in the August 12, 2016 order. ECF No. 14.
2. Defendant’s responsive pleading is due September 12, 2016. ECF No. 12.
Dated: August 24, 2016

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28

4 brown0637.rec

1