Brown v. Jewell et al

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/14/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel 8 is denied. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARILEE BROWN, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:16-cv-0637 MCE CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER SALLY JEWELL, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff brings this action challenging her termination from employment with the federal 18 government. Plaintiff has requested appointment of counsel. Although plaintiff does not cite a 19 specific statute in support of her request for counsel, it appears plaintiff is requesting appointment 20 of counsel pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1)(B). 21 Any successful application for appointment of counsel must comply with criteria set forth 22 in Bradshaw v. Zoological Society of San Diego, 662 F.2d 1301 (9th Cir. 1981). Before 23 appointing counsel to plaintiff, the court must consider (1) plaintiff’s financial resources, (2) the 24 efforts already made by plaintiff to secure counsel, and (3) plaintiff’s likelihood of success on the 25 merits. Id. at 1318. Appointment of counsel is not a matter of right. See Ivey v. Board of 26 Regents, 673 F. 2d 266 (9th Cir. 1982). 27 As discussed in the order directing plaintiff to pay the filing fee, plaintiff’s financial 28 resources do not weigh in favor of appointment of counsel. Plaintiff indicates she has paid 1 1 counsel in other matters but does not describe her efforts to secure counsel in the present action. 2 After reviewing the amended complaint, the court has determined appointment of counsel is not 3 warranted in this matter. 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for the appointment of 5 counsel (ECF No. 8) is denied. 6 Dated: April 14, 2016 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 4 brown0637.bradshaw.cou 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?