Coleman v. Peery, et al.

Filing 32

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/20/22 DISREGARDING 31 Motion motion for relief from judgment and for the appointment of counsel. The documents filed by petitioner will be disregarded. No orders will issue in response to future filings. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SAAHDI ABDUL COLEMAN,

12
13
14

No. 2:16-cv-0652 MCE AC P

Petitioner,
v.

ORDER

DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al.,

15

Respondents.

16
17

On September 12, 2022, petitioner filed a motion for relief from judgment and request for

18

the appointment of counsel. ECF No. 31. Several documents, including what appears to be part

19

of the original petition filed in March 2016, are attached. Id. at 5-53.

20

This petition for writ of habeas corpus was dismissed on March 21, 2018. ECF Nos. 24,

21

25. Thereafter, petitioner’s request for a certificate of appealability was denied by the Ninth

22

Circuit for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. ECF No. 30. For these

23

reasons, the documents filed by petitioner will be disregarded. No orders will issue in response to

24

future filings.

25

DATED: September 20, 2022

26
27
28