Callender v. Ramm et al

Filing 49

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/14/19 GRANTING 48 Motion for Extension. Plaintiff is GRANTED 60 days from the date of this order to file an opposition to 42 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant's reply, if any, is due within 7 days thereafter. (Coll, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

VINCENT ANTHONY CALLENDER,

12

No. 2:16-cv-0694 JAM AC P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

J. RAMM, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff has filed a motion for extension of time to file and serve an opposition to

17
18

defendants’ November 9, 2018 motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 48. In support of the

19

motion, plaintiff states that the prison in which he is housed will be on lockdown for three weeks

20

due to an institution-wide search, and that as a result, he is uncertain precisely how his legal

21

property will be stored until the search is completed. Id. at 1. Plaintiff also states that he will

22

need to conduct legal research. See id. at 1. In addition, it appears that plaintiff’s access to the

23

prison law library has been limited due the recent holidays. See generally id. at 2.

24

In light of these facts, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

25

1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 48) is GRANTED, and

26

////

27

////

28

////

1

2. Within sixty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file and serve an opposition to

2

defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Defendants’ reply, if any, shall be filed within seven

3

days thereafter.

4

DATED: January 14, 2019

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2