Felix v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 17

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/16/16 ORDERING that Defendant shall have an extension of time of an additional 14 days to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. The new due date will be November 28, 2016.(Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PHILLIP A. TALBERT Acting United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration CAROLYN B. CHEN, CSBN 256628 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8956 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Carolyn.Chen@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 BRIDGETT JANE MARIE FELIX, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 17 Defendant. 18 Case No.: 2:16-cv-00698-EFB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME OF 14 DAYS FOR DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective 20 counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of an additional 14 days to 21 respond to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. This is the second continuance sought by 22 Defendant. The current due date is November 14, 2016. The new due date will be November 23 28, 2016. 24 There is good cause for this request. Defendant is seeking this extension due to an 25 emergency and workload issues. Since the Court’s order of extension dated October 12, 2016, 26 Defendant’s counsel had a medical emergency on Monday, October 24, 2016, and was on leave 27 for about a week. 28 1 1 Defendant is requesting additional time up to and including November 28, 2016, to fully 2 review the record and research the issues presented by Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, 3 as Defendant’s counsel addresses her workload since her return. This request is made in good 4 faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. 5 6 The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly. 7 8 Respectfully submitted, Date: November 10, 2016 CERNEY KREUZE & LOTT, LLP 9 s/ Langley Ellen Kreuze by C.Chen* (As authorized by e-mail on 11/10/2016) LANGLEY ELLEN KREUZE Attorneys for Plaintiff 10 11 12 13 Date: November 10, 2016 14 PHILLIP A. TALBERT Acting United States Attorney By s/ Carolyn B. Chen CAROLYN B. CHEN Special Assistant U. S. Attorney 15 16 Attorneys for Defendant 17 18 19 20 ORDER APPROVED AND SO ORDERED. 21 22 23 DATED: November 16, 2016. _________________________________ HON. EDMUND F. BRENNAN UNITED STATE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?