Johnson v. Waterloo Enterprises, Inc.
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/31/2018 DENYING 23 request for an order of contempt and issuance of a bench warrant. Champ Patel, President of defendant Waterloo Enterprises, Inc., shall personally appear before Judge Newman on 10/11/2018, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 25 to SHOW CAUSE why he should not be held in contempt or have other appropriate sanctions imposed against him for failure to appear at the 8/16/2018 judgment debtor examination. A continued ju dgment debtor examination is set for 10/11/2018, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 25, before Judge Newman. Champ Patel shall personally appear for that judgment debtor examination. Plaintiff shall promptly serve a copy of this order on Mr. Patel at his last-known address by mail Plaintiff shall forthwith file a proof of service on the court's docket documenting such service. Mr. Patel is hereby CAUTIONED that failure to appear at the show cause hearing and the continued judgment debtor examination may result in a finding of contempt, the issuance of a bench warrant for his arrest, and/or the imposition of any other appropriate sanctions. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SCOTT JOHNSON,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:16-cv-711-MCE-KJN
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
WATERLOO ENTERPRISES, INC.
Defendant.
16
17
At an August 16, 2018 judgment debtor examination, Mr. Champ Patel, President of
18
defendant Waterloo Enterprises, Inc., failed to appear. (ECF No. 22.) Thereafter, on August 24,
19
2018, plaintiff requested the court to enter an order of contempt and issue a bench warrant for the
20
arrest of Mr. Patel. (ECF No. 23.) However, plaintiff’s request contains little briefing with
21
citation to relevant legal authorities in support of such severe relief, including whether the
22
requested contempt is civil or criminal in nature, the procedural and constitutional requirements
23
for imposing such relief, whether a hearing is first required, etc. Consequently, the court denies
24
plaintiff’s request without prejudice.
25
Instead, the court orders Mr. Patel to personally appear at a hearing on October 11, 2018,
26
to show cause why he should not be held in contempt or have other appropriate sanctions
27
imposed against him for failure to appear at the judgment debtor examination. The court also
28
simultaneously sets a continued judgment debtor examination for that same day.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. Plaintiff’s request for an order of contempt and issuance of a bench warrant (ECF No.
3
4
23) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
2. Champ Patel, President of defendant Waterloo Enterprises, Inc., shall personally
5
appear before Judge Newman on October 11, 2018, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No.
6
25 of the United States Courthouse located at 501 I Street, Sacramento, CA to SHOW
7
CAUSE why he should not be held in contempt or have other appropriate sanctions
8
imposed against him for failure to appear at the August 16, 2018 judgment debtor
9
examination.
10
3. A continued judgment debtor examination is set for October 11, 2018, at 10:00 a.m.,
11
in Courtroom No. 25 of the United States Courthouse located at 501 I Street,
12
Sacramento, CA before Judge Newman. Champ Patel, President of defendant
13
Waterloo Enterprises, Inc, shall personally appear for that judgment debtor
14
examination.
15
4. Plaintiff shall promptly serve a copy of this order on Mr. Patel at his last-known
16
address by mail, and if possible, provide additional notice via e-mail or telephone at
17
any last-known e-mail address or telephone number. Plaintiff shall forthwith file a
18
proof of service on the court’s docket documenting such service.
19
5. Mr. Patel is hereby CAUTIONED that failure to appear at the show cause hearing and
20
the continued judgment debtor examination may result in a finding of contempt, the
21
issuance of a bench warrant for his arrest, and/or the imposition of any other
22
appropriate sanctions.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 31, 2018
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?