Shaw v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department

Filing 8

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/1/2016 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SHEENA SHAW,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:16-cv-0729 TLN CKD PS

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT,
Defendant.

16
17

By order filed April 19, 2016, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to

18
19

file an amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff thereafter requested an extension of time and

20

plaintiff was granted an extension to July 8, 2016. Plaintiff again requested an extension of time

21

and by order filed July 25, 2016, plaintiff was granted until August 25, 2016 to file an amended

22

complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's

23

order.

24
25

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

26

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

27

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

28

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
1

1

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

2

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

3

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

4

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

5

Dated: September 1, 2016

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8

4 shaw0729.fta

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2