EZ Pedo, Inc. v. Mayclin Dental Studio, Inc.
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/17/17 ordering ( Settlement Conference set for 3/24/2017 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney.) (Plummer, M)
1 Michael L. Meeks (SBN: 172000)
mmeeks@buchalter.com
2 Paul J. Fraidenburgh (SBN: 280354)
pfraidenburgh@buchalter.com
3 BUCHALTER
A Professional Corporation
4 18400 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 800
Irvine, CA 92612-1121
5 Telephone: (949) 760-1121
Fax: (949) 224-6407
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
7 EZ PEDO, INC.
8 Adam P. Gislason, (SBN: 212540)
agislason@foxrothschild.com
9 Timothy C. Matson (Pro Hac Vice)
tmatson@foxrothschild.com
10 FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
Campbell Mithun Tower
11 222 South Ninth Street, Suite 2000
Minneapolis, MN 55402-3338
12 Telephone: 612.607.7060
13
Facsimile: 612.607.7100
Attorneys for Defendant MAYCLIN DENTAL
14 STUDIO, INC., a Minnesota corporation,
individually and dba KINDER KROWNS
15 Attorneys for Mayclin Dental Studio, Inc.,
a Minnesota corporation, individually and
16 dba Kinder Krowns, and Does 1-10
17
18
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20 EZ PEDO, INC., a California
corporation,
21
Plaintiff,
22
vs.
23
MAYCLIN DENTAL STUDIO, INC.,
24 a Minnesota corporation, individually
and dba KINDER KROWNS; and
25 DOES 1-10,
26
Case No. 2:16-cv-00731-KJM-CKD
JOINT REQUEST TO
RESCHEDULE SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE IN LIGHT OF
ONGOING EXPERT DISCOVERY
Defendants.
27
28
BUCHALTER
A PROFES SION AL CORPORAT ION
IRVINE
1
JOINT REQUEST TO RESCHEDULE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE IN
LIGHT OF ONGOING EXPERT DISCOVERY
BN 27587806v1BN 27818135v1
Pursuant to Local Rule 143, all parties hereby request the Court’s approval of
1
2 the following stipulation to reschedule the Settlement Conference currently set for
3 January 20, 2017 to March 10, 2017.
4
STIPULATION
5
WHEREAS, on November 9, 2016 the Pretrial Scheduling Order was
6 amended to extend expert discovery to March 1, 2017 (Dkt. 24);
7
WHEREAS, on January 5, 2017, the time for the completion of all other
8 discovery was extended to March 1, 2017 (Dkt. 27);
9
WHEREAS, a Settlement Conference is currently scheduled for January 20,
10 2017 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 24 pursuant to this Court’s Minute Order (Dkt. 21);
11
WHEREAS, the parties desire to reschedule the Settlement Conference to
12 March 24, 2017 so that discovery and expert reports may be completed prior to the
13 Settlement Conference;
14
WHEREAS, good cause exists for the Court to approve this stipulation so
15 that the parties can meaningfully participate in settlement discussions with
16 completed discovery and expert reports;
17
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:
18
(1)
19
The Settlement Conference currently scheduled for January 20, 2017
at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 24 shall be continued to March 24, 2017;
20 / / /
21 / / /
22 / / /
23 / / /
24 / / /
25 / / /
26 / / /
27 / / /
28 / / /
BUCHALTER
A PROFES SION AL CORPORAT ION
IRVINE
2
JOINT REQUEST FOR COURT APPROVAL OF STIPULATION TO
RESCHEDULE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
BN 27587806v1BN 27818135v1
1
2
(2)
This Stipulation shall become effective only upon the filing of the
Court’s Order approving this Stipulation.
3 So stipulated.
4
5 DATED: January 13, 2017
BUCHALTER
A Professional Corporation
6
7
By: /s/ Paul J. Fraidenburgh
PAUL J. FRAIDENBURGH
8
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff
EZ PEDO, INC.
10
11
DATED: January 13, 2017
FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
12
13
/s/ Adam Gislason
ADAM GISLASON
(As authorized in writing on January 13,
2017.)
14
15
16
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
MAYCLIN DENTAL STUDIO, INC.
DBA KINDER KROWNS
17
18
19 IT IS SO ORDERED.
20 Dated: January 17, 2017
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BUCHALTER
A PROFES SION AL CORPORAT ION
IRVINE
3
JOINT REQUEST FOR COURT APPROVAL OF STIPULATION TO
RESCHEDULE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
BN 27587806v1BN 27818135v1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?