EZ Pedo, Inc. v. Mayclin Dental Studio, Inc.

Filing 33

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/17/17 ordering ( Settlement Conference set for 3/24/2017 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney.) (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 Michael L. Meeks (SBN: 172000) mmeeks@buchalter.com 2 Paul J. Fraidenburgh (SBN: 280354) pfraidenburgh@buchalter.com 3 BUCHALTER A Professional Corporation 4 18400 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 800 Irvine, CA 92612-1121 5 Telephone: (949) 760-1121 Fax: (949) 224-6407 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 EZ PEDO, INC. 8 Adam P. Gislason, (SBN: 212540) agislason@foxrothschild.com 9 Timothy C. Matson (Pro Hac Vice) tmatson@foxrothschild.com 10 FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP Campbell Mithun Tower 11 222 South Ninth Street, Suite 2000 Minneapolis, MN 55402-3338 12 Telephone: 612.607.7060 13 Facsimile: 612.607.7100 Attorneys for Defendant MAYCLIN DENTAL 14 STUDIO, INC., a Minnesota corporation, individually and dba KINDER KROWNS 15 Attorneys for Mayclin Dental Studio, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, individually and 16 dba Kinder Krowns, and Does 1-10 17 18 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 EZ PEDO, INC., a California corporation, 21 Plaintiff, 22 vs. 23 MAYCLIN DENTAL STUDIO, INC., 24 a Minnesota corporation, individually and dba KINDER KROWNS; and 25 DOES 1-10, 26 Case No. 2:16-cv-00731-KJM-CKD JOINT REQUEST TO RESCHEDULE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE IN LIGHT OF ONGOING EXPERT DISCOVERY Defendants. 27 28 BUCHALTER A PROFES SION AL CORPORAT ION IRVINE 1 JOINT REQUEST TO RESCHEDULE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE IN LIGHT OF ONGOING EXPERT DISCOVERY BN 27587806v1BN 27818135v1 Pursuant to Local Rule 143, all parties hereby request the Court’s approval of 1 2 the following stipulation to reschedule the Settlement Conference currently set for 3 January 20, 2017 to March 10, 2017. 4 STIPULATION 5 WHEREAS, on November 9, 2016 the Pretrial Scheduling Order was 6 amended to extend expert discovery to March 1, 2017 (Dkt. 24); 7 WHEREAS, on January 5, 2017, the time for the completion of all other 8 discovery was extended to March 1, 2017 (Dkt. 27); 9 WHEREAS, a Settlement Conference is currently scheduled for January 20, 10 2017 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 24 pursuant to this Court’s Minute Order (Dkt. 21); 11 WHEREAS, the parties desire to reschedule the Settlement Conference to 12 March 24, 2017 so that discovery and expert reports may be completed prior to the 13 Settlement Conference; 14 WHEREAS, good cause exists for the Court to approve this stipulation so 15 that the parties can meaningfully participate in settlement discussions with 16 completed discovery and expert reports; 17 NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 18 (1) 19 The Settlement Conference currently scheduled for January 20, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 24 shall be continued to March 24, 2017; 20 / / / 21 / / / 22 / / / 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / BUCHALTER A PROFES SION AL CORPORAT ION IRVINE 2 JOINT REQUEST FOR COURT APPROVAL OF STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE BN 27587806v1BN 27818135v1 1 2 (2) This Stipulation shall become effective only upon the filing of the Court’s Order approving this Stipulation. 3 So stipulated. 4 5 DATED: January 13, 2017 BUCHALTER A Professional Corporation 6 7 By: /s/ Paul J. Fraidenburgh PAUL J. FRAIDENBURGH 8 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff EZ PEDO, INC. 10 11 DATED: January 13, 2017 FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP 12 13 /s/ Adam Gislason ADAM GISLASON (As authorized in writing on January 13, 2017.) 14 15 16 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT MAYCLIN DENTAL STUDIO, INC. DBA KINDER KROWNS 17 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 Dated: January 17, 2017 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BUCHALTER A PROFES SION AL CORPORAT ION IRVINE 3 JOINT REQUEST FOR COURT APPROVAL OF STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE BN 27587806v1BN 27818135v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?