Erhard v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 09/22/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's 13 Motion to Quash is DENIED; documents produced pursuant to the subpoena shall be subject to the 9 protective order. (Benson, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ST. JOHN ERHARD,

12
13
14

No. 2:16-cv-0735 MCE CKD

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.,

15

Defendant.

16
17

Plaintiff’s motion to quash came on regularly for hearing on September 21, 2016. Renee

18

Parras appeared for plaintiff. Susan Joo appeared for defendant. Upon review of the documents

19

in support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing

20

therefor, THE COURT FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

21

The records defendant seeks by way of subpoena are relevant to the issues raised in this

22

action and do not unduly invade plaintiff’s privacy. According, plaintiff’s motion to quash (ECF

23

No. 13) is denied. Documents produced pursuant to the subpoena shall be subject to the

24

protective order (ECF No. 9).

25

Dated: September 22, 2016

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28

4 stjohn735.oah

1