Erhard v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 09/22/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's 13 Motion to Quash is DENIED; documents produced pursuant to the subpoena shall be subject to the 9 protective order. (Benson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ST. JOHN ERHARD,
12
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-0735 MCE CKD
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff’s motion to quash came on regularly for hearing on September 21, 2016. Renee
18
Parras appeared for plaintiff. Susan Joo appeared for defendant. Upon review of the documents
19
in support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing
20
therefor, THE COURT FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
21
The records defendant seeks by way of subpoena are relevant to the issues raised in this
22
action and do not unduly invade plaintiff’s privacy. According, plaintiff’s motion to quash (ECF
23
No. 13) is denied. Documents produced pursuant to the subpoena shall be subject to the
24
protective order (ECF No. 9).
25
Dated: September 22, 2016
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
4 stjohn735.oah
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?