Erhard v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 09/22/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's 13 Motion to Quash is DENIED; documents produced pursuant to the subpoena shall be subject to the 9 protective order. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ST. JOHN ERHARD, 12 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-0735 MCE CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff’s motion to quash came on regularly for hearing on September 21, 2016. Renee 18 Parras appeared for plaintiff. Susan Joo appeared for defendant. Upon review of the documents 19 in support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing 20 therefor, THE COURT FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 21 The records defendant seeks by way of subpoena are relevant to the issues raised in this 22 action and do not unduly invade plaintiff’s privacy. According, plaintiff’s motion to quash (ECF 23 No. 13) is denied. Documents produced pursuant to the subpoena shall be subject to the 24 protective order (ECF No. 9). 25 Dated: September 22, 2016 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 4 stjohn735.oah 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?