Early et al v. Keystone Restaurant Group, LLC et al
Filing
97
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/26/18, GRANTING in PART, and DENYING in PART Plaintiff's 40 Motion for Summary Adjudication. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
JOCELYN BURTON (SBN 135879)
SCOTT S. NAKAMA (SBN 296732)
Burton Employment Law
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 400
Oakland, CA 94612
Ph: (510) 350-7025
Fax: (510) 473-3672
e-mail: jburton@burtonemploymentlaw.com
e-mail: snakama@burtonemploymentlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JASON EARLY as Guardian Ad Litem for
S.E.
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
KEYSTONE RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC, )
)
SONIC INDUSTRIES INC., SONIC
)
FRANCHISING LLC AND SONIC
)
INDUSTRIES LLC,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
_____________________________________ )
JASON EARLY as Guardian Ad Litem for
S.E.
24
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART, PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
ADJUDICATION
On November 21, 2017, the Court heard Plaintiff’s motion for summary adjudication on
22
23
Case No. 2:16-cv-00740-JAM-DB
Plaintiff’s second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth and ninth causes of action of the First
Amended Complaint. Having considered all of the papers filed by the parties and oral arguments on
25
the motion, the Court grants the motion as to the fourth cause of action and denies the motion as to
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION,
EARLY v. KEYSTONE RESTAURANT GROUP LLC, No. 2:16-cv-00740-JAM-DB
1
.
1
the second, third, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth and ninth causes of action of the First Amended
2
Complaint.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
6
Dated: March 26, 2018
7
/s/ JOHN A. MENDEZ
JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION,
EARLY v. KEYSTONE RESTAURANT GROUP LLC, No. 2:16-cv-00740-JAM-DB
2
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?