Mason v. City of Sacramento et al

Filing 37

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/18/17 ORDERING good cause appearing therefore, the Court hereby orders the DISMISSAL of the entire action with prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

ETAN E. ROSEN (173728)
BEYER, POMGRATZ, & Rosen
3230 Ramos Circle
Sacramento, CA 95827
Telephone [phone]
Telecopier [phone]
Attorney for Plaintiff JEWEL MASON
JAMES SANCHEZ, City Attorney (SBN 116356)
KATHLEEN T. ROGAN, Senior Deputy City Attorney (SBN 186055)
[e-mail]
CITY OF SACRAMENTO
915 I Street, Room 4010
Sacramento, CA 95814-2608
Telephone: [phone]
Telecopier: [phone]
Attorneys for the DEFENDANTS

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE [FRCP 41(2)]

Plaintiff,

15
16

Case No.: 2:16-CV-00744-JAM-EFB

JEWEL MASON,

vs.
CITY OF SACRAMENTO; ELSIE FONG,
in her individual and official capacities;
MIKE MALONE, in his individual and
official capacities; and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,
Defendants.

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(2), after the matter has been resolved
and settled at VDRP, the parties hereby, by and through their undersigned counsel of record hereby
STIPULATE and agree that this action be, and hereby is, dismissed in its entirety with prejudice.
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
Dated: October 18, 2017

JAMES SANCHEZ,
City Attorney

26
27
28

By:

/s/
KATHLEEN T. ROGAN
Senior Deputy City Attorney
1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE [FRCP 41(2)]

Attorneys for the DEFENDANTS

1
2

Dated: October 18, 2016

BEYER, PONGRATZ, AND ROSEN

3
By:

4
5

/s/
ETAN ROSEN
Attorney for plaintiff JEWEL MASON

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Good cause appearing therefore, the Court hereby orders the dismissal of the entire
action with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 10/18/2017

/s/ John A. Mendez_________________________
HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE [FRCP 41(2)]