Plummer v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 01/26/17 ORDERING that defendant's due date for the response to plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 03/06/17. (Benson, A)
7
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
ROYA MASSOUMI, CSBN 242697
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8957
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: Roya.Massoumi@SSA.gov
8
Attorneys for Defendant
1
2
3
4
5
6
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
12
13
TATYANA PLUMMER,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
vs.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL1,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
17
Defendant.
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:16-CV-00753-AC
JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
19
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record,
20
21
that the time for responding to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from
22
February 3, 2017, to March 6, 2017 due to current workload demands. Defendant currently has
23
four othe pending responses due the same time as the current deadline and a Ninth Circuit
24
responsive brief due to the U.S. Attorney’s Office thereafter. This is Defendant’s first request
25
for extension. Defendant respectfully requests additional time to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion
26
for Summary Judgment in order to adequately research and analyze the issues presented by
27
1
28
Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as
the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of
section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time; 2:16-CV-00753-AC
1
1
Plaintiff. Defendant makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the
2
proceedings.
3
4
The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified
accordingly.
5
Respectfully submitted,
6
7
Dated: January 25, 2017
/s/ *Jesse Kaplan
(*as authorized by email on January 25, 2017)
JESSE KAPLAN
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: January 25, 2017
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
By
15
16
17
/s/ Roya Massoumi
Roya Massoumi
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Of Counsel:
TINA L. NAICKER
Assistant Regional Counsel
18
19
Attorneys for Defendant
20
ORDER
21
22
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED:
23
24
DATED: January 26, 2017
25
26
27
28
Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time; 2:16-CV-00753-AC
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?