Rosales v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
30
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/24/2017 DEEMING the 29 Reply timely. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND
Forslund Law, LLC
CSBN 154575
P.O. Box 4476
Sunriver, OR 97707
Telephone:
541-419-0074
Fax:
541-593-4452
Email:
jaf@forslundlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
FAITH MARIE ANAYA ROSALES,
)
)
Plaintiff
)
)
v.
)
)
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
)
Acting Comm’r of Social Security,
)
)
Defendant
)
)
____________________________________)
Case No. 2:16-cv-00761-CMK
STIPULATION AND
ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S REPLY BRIEF
17
18
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to extend
19
the time 7 Days to May 22, 2016, for Plaintiff to file her Reply Brief, in accordance with the Court’s
20
Scheduling Order. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension. It is requested due to the fact that
21
Plaintiff’s counsel has not yet had adequate time to review Defendant’s arguments in this case.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Rosales v. Colvin
Stipulation and Proposed Order
E.D. Cal. 2:16-cv-00761-CMK
The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order be modified
1
2
accordingly.
3
4
Respectfully submitted,
5
6
7
Date: May 15, 2017
JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND
Attorney at Law
8
9
10
/s/Jacqueline A. Forslund
JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND
11
Attorney for Plaintiff
12
13
Date: May 15, 2017
14
15
16
PHILIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
19
/s/Michael K. Marriott
MICHAEL K. MARRIOTT
Special Assistant United States Attorney
*By email authorization
20
Attorney for Defendant
17
18
21
ORDER
22
23
24
25
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED. PLAINTIFF’S REPLY BRIEF, FILED ON MAY 22, 2017, IS
DEEMED TIMELY.
Dated: May 24, 2017
26
27
28
Rosales v. Colvin
Stipulation and Proposed Order
E.D. Cal. 2:16-cv-00761-CMK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?