Roseberry v. Ramirez et al

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/6/2017 ORDERING plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing, within 30 days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to file an amended complaint. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN ROSEBERRY, 12 13 14 15 16 17 No. 2:16-cv-0766-CMK Plaintiff, vs. ORDER R. RAMIREZ, et al. Defendant. / Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 19 636(c) and no other party has been served or appeared in the action. 20 On May 15, 2017, the court directed plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 21 30 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file an amended complaint may result in dismissal 22 of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local 23 Rule 110. To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. 24 Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, within 30 days of the date of this order, why 25 this action should not be dismissed for failure to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff is again 26 warned that failure to respond to this order may result in dismissal of the action for the reasons 1 1 2 outlined above, as well as for failure to prosecute and comply with court rules and orders. See id. IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 5 6 DATED: July 6, 2017 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?