Stenson v. United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York

Filing 11

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/2/2016 GRANTING the plaintiff leave to file an Amended Complaint; ORDERING the defendant to file a responsive pleading by 10/3/2016. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 Linda B. Oliver (SBN 166720) 2 3 4 5 loliver@maynardcooper.com MAYNARD COOPER & GALE, LLP 600 Montgomery Street, Suite 2600 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 704-7433 Facsimile: (205) 254-1999 Attorney for Defendant UNITED STATES LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 6 7 8 9 T.D. Bolling, Jr. (SBN 33236) BOLLING & GAWTHROP A Professional Corporation 8880 Cal Center Drive, Suite 190 Sacramento, California 95826 Telephone: (916) 369-0777 Facsimile: (916) 369-2698 10 Attorney for Plaintiff MARGO STENSION 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 MARGO STENSION, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 vs. UNITED STATES LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:16-CV-00782-JAM-CKD STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND 19 20 21 {03779884.1} STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND Plaintiff Margo Stension (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant United States Life Insurance 1 2 3 Company (“Defendant” or “US Life”), hereby jointly stipulate by and through their respective attorneys of record as follows: 1. 4 This action involves a dispute between the parties concerning an accidental death and dismemberment policy under which plaintiff’s decedent was insured at the time of his death; 5 2. The present deadline for Defendant US Life to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint on 6 file herein is September 2, 2016; 3. 7 8 9 Coroner issued an amended death certificate for Plaintiff’s decedent, a copy of which has been provided by counsel for Plaintiff to counsel for Defendant; 4. 10 After the original complaint in this action was filed, the Sacramento County Counsel for Plaintiff has advised Counsel for Defendant of his intention to file an amended complaint in this action that will reflect the amended death certificate issued by the 11 Sacramento County Coroner and will add a cause of action for breach of the implied covenant of 12 good faith and fair dealing; 5. 13 14 15 counsel for Defendant, who has agreed to stipulate to an order granting leave to file an amended complaint; 6. 16 Counsel for Plaintiff has provided a draft copy of the amended complaint to Counsel for both parties agree that Defendant’s deadline to file a response to the complaint may be extended by 30 days, until October 3, 206, and no response to the original 17 pleading need be filed if this Court issues an order allowing the filing of the amended complaint. 18 For the foregoing reasons, the parties jointly request that the Court issue an order (1) 19 granting Plaintiff leave to file an Amended Complaint, and (2) extending the time of Defendant 20 US Life to respond to and including October 3, 2016. /// 21 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND {03779884.1} 1 Date: September 2, 2016 MAYNARD, COOPER & GALE, LLP By: /s/ Linda B. Oliver 2 Linda B. Oliver 3 Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 4 5 Date: September 2, 2016 BOLLING & GAWTHROP 6 By: /s/ T.D. Bolling, Jr ____ 7 T.D. Bolling, JR. 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff MARGO STENSION 9 ORDER 10 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY 11 ORDERED THAT (1) Plaintiff has leave to file an Amended Complaint and (2) Defendant’s 12 shall file a responsive pleading on or before October 3, 2016. 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 9/2/2016 15 /s/ John A. Mendez________________ JOHN A MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND {03779884.1}

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?