Stenson v. United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York
Filing
11
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/2/2016 GRANTING the plaintiff leave to file an Amended Complaint; ORDERING the defendant to file a responsive pleading by 10/3/2016. (Michel, G.)
1 Linda B. Oliver (SBN 166720)
2
3
4
5
loliver@maynardcooper.com
MAYNARD COOPER & GALE, LLP
600 Montgomery Street, Suite 2600
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 704-7433
Facsimile: (205) 254-1999
Attorney for Defendant
UNITED STATES LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY
6
7
8
9
T.D. Bolling, Jr. (SBN 33236)
BOLLING & GAWTHROP
A Professional Corporation
8880 Cal Center Drive, Suite 190
Sacramento, California 95826
Telephone: (916) 369-0777
Facsimile: (916) 369-2698
10 Attorney for Plaintiff
MARGO STENSION
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13 MARGO STENSION,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
vs.
UNITED STATES LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendant.
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:16-CV-00782-JAM-CKD
STIPULATION AND ORDER
GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR
DEFENDANT TO RESPOND
19
20
21
{03779884.1}
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND
Plaintiff Margo Stension (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant United States Life Insurance
1
2
3
Company (“Defendant” or “US Life”), hereby jointly stipulate by and through their respective
attorneys of record as follows:
1.
4
This action involves a dispute between the parties concerning an accidental death
and dismemberment policy under which plaintiff’s decedent was insured at the time of his death;
5
2.
The present deadline for Defendant US Life to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint on
6 file herein is September 2, 2016;
3.
7
8
9
Coroner issued an amended death certificate for Plaintiff’s decedent, a copy of which has been
provided by counsel for Plaintiff to counsel for Defendant;
4.
10
After the original complaint in this action was filed, the Sacramento County
Counsel for Plaintiff has advised Counsel for Defendant of his intention to file an
amended complaint in this action that will reflect the amended death certificate issued by the
11 Sacramento County Coroner and will add a cause of action for breach of the implied covenant of
12 good faith and fair dealing;
5.
13
14
15
counsel for Defendant, who has agreed to stipulate to an order granting leave to file an amended
complaint;
6.
16
Counsel for Plaintiff has provided a draft copy of the amended complaint to
Counsel for both parties agree that Defendant’s deadline to file a response to the
complaint may be extended by 30 days, until October 3, 206, and no response to the original
17 pleading need be filed if this Court issues an order allowing the filing of the amended complaint.
18
For the foregoing reasons, the parties jointly request that the Court issue an order (1)
19 granting Plaintiff leave to file an Amended Complaint, and (2) extending the time of Defendant
20
US Life to respond to and including October 3, 2016.
///
21
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND
{03779884.1}
1 Date: September 2, 2016
MAYNARD, COOPER & GALE, LLP
By: /s/ Linda B. Oliver
2
Linda B. Oliver
3
Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATES LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
4
5 Date: September 2, 2016
BOLLING & GAWTHROP
6
By: /s/ T.D. Bolling, Jr ____
7
T.D. Bolling, JR.
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MARGO STENSION
9
ORDER
10
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY
11 ORDERED THAT (1) Plaintiff has leave to file an Amended Complaint and (2) Defendant’s
12 shall file a responsive pleading on or before October 3, 2016.
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 9/2/2016
15
/s/ John A. Mendez________________
JOHN A MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND
{03779884.1}
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?