Zolensky II v. American Medflight, Inc.
Filing
11
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/11/16 ORDERING counsel for defendant American Medflight, Inc. is hereby ORDERED, within seven (7) days of entry of this order, to show cause why he should not be sanctioned in the amount of $250 for his failure to comply with this court's order. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT ZOLENSKY II,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 2:16-cv-00788-KJM-KJN
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
AMERICAN MEDFLIGHT, INC.; and
DOES 1 THROUGH 10, inclusive,
Defendants.
17
18
On April 18, 2016 this court issued a standing order. ECF No. 3-1. In the order,
19
the parties were directed to engage in a meet and confer prior to filing a motion. Id. at 3. The
20
meet and confer directive was designed to have the parties discuss thoroughly the substance of the
21
contemplated motion and any potential resolution. Id. After meeting and conferring, if a party
22
still desired to file a motion, that party was directed to file a notice of motion containing “a
23
certification by counsel filing the motion that meet and confer efforts have been exhausted, with a
24
brief summary of meet and confer efforts.” Id.
25
On April 19, 2016, defendant American Medflight, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss
26
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 7. American Medflight, Inc.’s counsel
27
did not file a certification indicating that meet and confer efforts have been exhausted. Thus,
28
counsel did not comply with the 2016 standing order.
1
1
Accordingly, counsel for defendant American Medflight, Inc. is hereby
2
ORDERED, within seven (7) days of entry of this order, to show cause why he should not be
3
sanctioned in the amount of $250 for his failure to comply with this court’s order.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: July 11, 2016.
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?