Turner v. Mattuecci
Filing
16
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/3/2017 ORDERING that the petitioner SHOW CAUSE, within twenty-one days, why respondent's 1/24/2017 13 Motion to Dismiss should not be granted.(Washington, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTHONY DAWAYNE LEE TURNER,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-0791 JAM KJN P
v.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
DOLLY MATTUECCI,
15
Respondents.
16
Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with an application for writ of habeas
17
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 24, 2017, respondent filed a motion to dismiss.
19
Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure
20
of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be
21
deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” Id.
22
Although it appears from the file that petitioner’s copies of recent orders were returned,
23
petitioner was properly served. It is the petitioner’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of
24
his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record
25
address of the party is fully effective.
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner show cause, within
2
twenty-one days, why respondent’s January 24, 2017 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 13) should not
3
be granted.
4
Dated: March 3, 2017
5
6
7
8
turn0791.46h
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?