Stricklen v. Kelly Services
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/6/2016 ORDERING that Service of process of the complaint is DEEMED accepted. Kelly Services shall file a response to the complaint within 30 days of this order. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve E. Joseph Connaughton, at Paul, Plevin, Sulivan & Connaughton, 101 West Broadway, 9th Floor, San Diego, CA 92101-8285, with a copy of this order. (Jackson, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
HARRIET STRICKLEN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-0804 TLN GGH PS
v.
ORDER
KELLY SERVICES,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. At the October 6, 2016
17
18
hearing in plaintiff’s related case, Stricklen v. Johnson & Johnson, No. 2:16-cv-805, the issue of
19
service of process on Kelly Services in the instant case was raised by the court, based on
20
problems with acceptance of service by Kelly Services’ agent, CT Corporation System. See ECF
21
Nos. 10, 13. Joseph Connaughton, counsel for Johnson & Johnson and ALZA Corporation,
22
indicated that he would also be representing Kelly Services in this case and stipulated to service
23
of process of the complaint as of the date of the hearing.
24
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
25
1. Service of process of the complaint is deemed accepted. Kelly Services shall file a
response to the complaint within thirty days of this order.
26
27
////
28
////
1
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve E. Joseph Connaughton, at Paul, Plevin,
2
Sulivan & Connaughton, 101 West Broadway, 9th Floor, San Diego, CA 92101-8285,
3
with a copy of this order.
4
Dated: October 6, 2016
5
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
GGH:076/Stricklen0804.svc
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?