Harris v. Macomber et al

Filing 178

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 12/8/2023 SETTING this case for a Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson, by Zoom video conference, on 2/29/2024 at 01:30 PM, and STAYING this case until 30 days after the settlement conference. (cc: JDP, ADR) (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GRADY HARRIS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-0830 TLN DB P v. ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE JEFF MACOMBER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights 17 18 action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court has determined that this case will benefit 19 from a settlement conference. Therefore, this case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. 20 Peterson to conduct a settlement conference on February 29, 2024 at 1:30 p.m. The settlement 21 conference will be conducted by remote means, with all parties appearing by Zoom video 22 conference. The Court will issue the necessary transportation order in due course. The Court expects that the parties will proceed with the settlement conference in good 23 24 faith and attempt to resolve all or part of the case. If any party believes that the settlement 25 conference will not be productive, that party shall so inform the court as far in advance of the 26 settlement conference as possible. 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. This case is stayed until thirty days following the settlement conference. 3 2. The case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson 4 on February 29, 2024, at 1:30 p.m. The settlement conference will be conducted by remote 5 means, with all parties appearing by Zoom video conference. 6 3. Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the court, the following individuals must 7 attend the settlement conference: (1) all of the attorney(s) who will try the case; and (2) 8 individuals with full authority to negotiate and settle the case, on any terms. 9 4. No later than one week prior to the settlement conference, each party must submit to 10 Judge Peterson’s chambers at jdporders@caed.uscourts.gov, or by mail at U.S. District Court, 11 501 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814, a confidential settlement conference statement. These 12 statements should neither be filed on the docket nor served on any other party. The statements 13 should be marked “CONFIDENTIAL” and should state the date and time of the conference. The 14 statements should not be lengthy but should include: 15 a. A brief recitation of the facts; 16 b. A discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the case; 17 c. An itemized estimate of the expected costs for further discovery, pretrial, and trial 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 matters, in specific dollar terms; d. Your best estimate of the probability that plaintiff will obtain a finding of liability should this case proceed to trial, in percentage terms; e. Should this case proceed to trial and defendant be found liable, please provide the following, in specific dollar terms: i. A realistic high-end recovery estimate (i.e., realistic best- or worstcase scenario); ii. A realistic low-end recovery estimate (i.e., realistic worst- or bestcase scenario); and iii. A best estimate of the most likely outcome; 28 2 1 f. A history of settlement discussions, including: 2 i. A statement of your expectations for settlement discussions; 3 ii. A listing of any past and present settlement offers from any party 4 (including all terms); and 5 iii. Whether your party would consider making the opening offer or demand, and what that offer might be1; 6 7 g. A list of the individuals who will be participating in the settlement conference on your party’s behalf, including each participant’s name and, if appropriate, title: 8 h. Plaintiff’s anticipated release date; 9 10 i. An estimate of restitution and fees, including court fees and filing fees, owed by 11 plaintiff; and 12 j. Identification of any related cases or of any other cases that the parties might wish 13 to discuss at this settlement conference. 14 5. Judge Peterson or another representative from the court will be contacting the parties 15 either by telephone or in person, approximately two weeks prior to the settlement 16 conference, to ascertain each party’s expectations of the settlement conference. 17 6. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of the this order on the Litigation 18 Office at High Desert State Prison via facsimile at (530) 251-5031 or via email. 19 Dated: December 8, 2023 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Please note that Judge Peterson will consider this response, among others, in evaluating whether proceeding with a settlement conference appears worthwhile. 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?