Harris v. Macomber et al

Filing 183

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 3/11/2024 DENYING 173 Plaintiff's Motion for witness locations as moot. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GRADY HARRIS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-0830 TLN DB P v. ORDER JEFF MACOMBER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se with an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 Plaintiff claims that defendants used excessive force, failed to protect him, and retaliated against 19 him in violation of his constitutional rights. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for 20 witness locations. (ECF No. 173.) By order dated April 18, 2023, the undersigned ordered plaintiff to file a statement with 21 22 names of witnesses he needed assistance locating. (ECF No. 161.) The order further directed 23 defendants to file a document explaining the incarceration status of each witness and place of 24 incarceration for any incarcerated witnesses. (Id.) In response, plaintiff filed the instant motion 25 seeking the location of eight incarcerated witnesses. (ECF No. 173.) Thereafter, defendants filed 26 the required response providing plaintiff with the requested information. (ECF No. 174.) 27 Accordingly, the undersigned will deny plaintiff’s motion as moot. 28 //// 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for witness locations (ECF No. 173) is 2 denied as moot. 3 Dated: March 11, 2024 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 DB:12 DB/DB Prisoner Inbox/Civil Rights/R/harr0830.witn.loc 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?