Harris v. Macomber et al
Filing
183
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 3/11/2024 DENYING 173 Plaintiff's Motion for witness locations as moot. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GRADY HARRIS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-0830 TLN DB P
v.
ORDER
JEFF MACOMBER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se with an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
18
Plaintiff claims that defendants used excessive force, failed to protect him, and retaliated against
19
him in violation of his constitutional rights. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for
20
witness locations. (ECF No. 173.)
By order dated April 18, 2023, the undersigned ordered plaintiff to file a statement with
21
22
names of witnesses he needed assistance locating. (ECF No. 161.) The order further directed
23
defendants to file a document explaining the incarceration status of each witness and place of
24
incarceration for any incarcerated witnesses. (Id.) In response, plaintiff filed the instant motion
25
seeking the location of eight incarcerated witnesses. (ECF No. 173.) Thereafter, defendants filed
26
the required response providing plaintiff with the requested information. (ECF No. 174.)
27
Accordingly, the undersigned will deny plaintiff’s motion as moot.
28
////
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for witness locations (ECF No. 173) is
2
denied as moot.
3
Dated: March 11, 2024
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
DB:12
DB/DB Prisoner Inbox/Civil Rights/R/harr0830.witn.loc
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?