Peters v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al.

Filing 11

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/16/2016 ORDERING that no later than 6/30/2016, plaintiff shall file his Opposition, if any, to defendants' Motion To Dismiss, or a statement that he is relying on his motion to remand. No later than 7/13/2016, the parties shall file their Replies, if any, to the cross-motions. The hearing on the cross-motions, currently scheduled for 6/29/2016, is CONTINUED to 8/3/2016. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MARK R. PETERS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:16-cv-0834 JAM AC (PS)

v.

ORDER

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff is proceeding in this removed action pro se. This proceeding was accordingly

17
18

referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21).
Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, currently

19
20

scheduled to be heard on June 29, 2016. ECF Nos. 3 (motion), 8 (order continuing hearing).

21

Plaintiff has filed a cross-motion to remand. ECF No. 6. Plaintiff has now requested a 15-day

22

extension of his time to file an opposition to the motion to dismiss, citing the emergency

23

hospitalization of his son. ECF No. 10.

24

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

25

1. No later than June 30, 2016, plaintiff shall file his Opposition, if any, to defendants’

26

Motion To Dismiss, or a statement that he is relying on his motion to remand;
2. No later than July 13, 2016, the parties shall file their Replies, if any, to the cross-motions;

27
28

and

1

1

3. The hearing on the cross-motions, currently scheduled for June 29, 2016, is CONTINUED

2

to August 3, 2016.

3

DATED: June 16, 2016

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2