Peters v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al.

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/1/16: HEARING as to 12 MOTION to DISMISS and 3 MOTION to DISMISS RESET for 8/24/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MARK R. PETERS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:16-cv-0834 JAM AC (PS)

v.

ORDER

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff is proceeding in this removed action pro se. This proceeding was accordingly

17
18

referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21).
Defendant Option One Mortgage has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, currently

19
20

scheduled to be heard on August 3, 2016. ECF No. 12. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or a

21

statement of non-opposition. Defendant Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss, and plaintiff’s motion

22

to remand are also scheduled to be heard on August 3, 2016.

23

To ensure that all motions are fully briefed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

24

1. No later than August 10, 2016, plaintiff shall respond to Option One Mortgage’s Motion

25

To Dismiss;
2. Option One Mortgage may file a reply no later than August 17, 2016; and

26
27

////

28

////

1

1

3. The hearing on all the pending motions, currently scheduled for August 3, 2016, is

2

CONTINUED to August 24, 2016.

3

DATED: August 1, 2016

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2