Peters v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al.
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/1/16: HEARING as to 12 MOTION to DISMISS and 3 MOTION to DISMISS RESET for 8/24/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARK R. PETERS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-0834 JAM AC (PS)
v.
ORDER
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is proceeding in this removed action pro se. This proceeding was accordingly
17
18
referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21).
Defendant Option One Mortgage has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, currently
19
20
scheduled to be heard on August 3, 2016. ECF No. 12. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or a
21
statement of non-opposition. Defendant Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss, and plaintiff’s motion
22
to remand are also scheduled to be heard on August 3, 2016.
23
To ensure that all motions are fully briefed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
24
1. No later than August 10, 2016, plaintiff shall respond to Option One Mortgage’s Motion
25
To Dismiss;
2. Option One Mortgage may file a reply no later than August 17, 2016; and
26
27
////
28
////
1
1
3. The hearing on all the pending motions, currently scheduled for August 3, 2016, is
2
CONTINUED to August 24, 2016.
3
DATED: August 1, 2016
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?