Engineered Door Industries, Inc. v. K.O.O. Construction, Inc. et al.

Filing 14

ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 07/11/16 ORDERING that, pursuant to the parties' 13 Consent, the Clerk of the Court shall REASSIGN this case to the Honorable Edmund F. Brennan. The new case number is 2:16-cv-0836 EFB. All currently scheduled dates presently set before the District Judge are hereby VACATED. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 ENGINEERED DOOR INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff, 13 14 15 Case No. CIV-S-16-cv-00836 WBS-EFB v. ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT K.O.O. CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has filed a AConsent to Proceed Before a 20 United States Magistrate Judge.@ See 28 U.S.C. ' 636(c). According to E.D. Cal. R. 305, both the 21 district court judge assigned to the case and the magistrate judge must approve the reference to the 22 magistrate judge. 23 The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and recommends that the above-captioned case 24 be assigned and referred to the magistrate judge for all further proceedings and entry of final 25 judgment. 26 27 28 Page 1 of 2 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to the Honorable 2 Edmund F. Brennan. The parties shall take note that all documents hereafter filed with the Clerk of 3 the Court shall bear case number CIV-S-16-cv-00836-EFB. All currently scheduled dates presently 4 set before the District Judge are hereby VACATED. 5 Dated: July 11, 2016 6 7 8 9 10 11 Having also reviewed the file, I accept reference of this case for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment. 12 DATED: July 11, 2016 13 14 15 EDMUND F. BRENNAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?