Lee v. Bluestem Brands, Inc.

Filing 12

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/16/16 ORDERING that the 11 Stipulation and Proposed Protective Order is NOT APPROVED. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY LEE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:16-cv-0838 JAM AC v. ORDER BLUESTEM BRANDS, INC. d/b/a FINGERHUT, Defendant. 16 17 The parties have submitted a stipulation and proposed order for a protective order. ECF 18 19 No. 11. This matter was accordingly referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local 20 Rule”) 302(c)(1). 21 The stipulation makes reference to Local Rule 79-5 which, according to the stipulation, 22 governs filing documents under seal. However, this court has no Local Rule 79-5. The parties 23 are directed to this court’s Local Rules for information on filing documents under seal, Local 24 Rule 141, and all other matters governed by the Local Rules. See 25 http://www.caed.uscourts.gov/caednew/index.cfm/rules/local-rules/. In addition, stipulated 26 protective orders must be directed to the magistrate judge. See Local Rule 302(c)(1). 27 //// 28 //// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulation and proposed order (ECF 2 No. 11) are NOT APPROVED. 3 DATED: December 16, 2016 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?