Johnson v. Flowers Baking Co. of California, LLC
Filing
23
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 09/11/17 ORDERING that action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
ERIC A. GROVER (SBN 136080)
eagrover@kellergrover.com
ELLYN MOSCOWITZ (SBN 129287)
emoscowitz@moscowitzlaw.com
ROBERT W. SPENCER (SBN 238491)
rspencer@kellergrover.com
KELLER GROVER LLP
1965 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94103
Telephone: (415) 543-1305
Facsimile: (415) 543-7861
12
SCOT BERNSTEIN (SBN 94915)
swampadero@sbernsteinlaw.com
LAW OFFICES OF SCOT D. BERNSTEIN,
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
101 Parkshore Drive, Suite 100
Folsom, California 95630
Telephone: (916) 447-0100
Facsimile: (916) 933-5533
13
Attorneys for Plaintiff
9
10
11
MATTHEW MELLEN (SBN233350)
email@mellenlawfirm.com
MELLEN LAW FIRM
One Embarcadero Center, Fifth Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 315-1653
Facsimile: (415) 276-1902
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
DONALD JOHNSON, an individual,
17
18
19
20
21
22
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-00840-JAM-AC
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE
DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
v.
FLOWERS BAKING CO. OF
CALIFORNIA, LLC, a limited liability
company; and DOES 1 through 100,
inclusive,
FRCP Rule 41(a)(2)
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-00840-JAM-AC
1
Plaintiff Donald Johnson (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Flowers Baking Co. of California,
2
LLC (“Defendant”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby respectfully submit the
3
following Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to allow for the dismissal of this action without
4
prejudice.
5
STIPULATION
6
WHEREAS, the Court approved the parties’ stipulation to add Plaintiff as a party to the
7
action entitled Brownfield, et al. v. Flowers Baking Co. of California, LLC, Case No. 2:15-cv-
8
02034-JAM-AC (Brownfield Dkt. 46);
9
WHEREAS, the Court approved the dismissal of this action without prejudice once a
10
Second Amended Complaint was filed in Brownfield that, among other things, added Plaintiff’s
11
claims to the Brownfield action (Brownfield Dkt. 46); and
12
13
WHEREAS, the Brownfield Second Amended Complaint adding Plaintiff’s claims has
been filed (Brownfield Dkt. 47).
14
15
NOW THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree that this action shall be dismissed
without prejudice.
16
17
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
18
//
19
20
//
21
//
22
23
//
24
//
25
26
//
27
//
28
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-00840-JAM-AC
1
Dated: September 11, 2017
KELLER GROVER LLP
2
3
By
/s/Eric A. Grover
4
ERIC A. GROVER
ROBERT SPENCER
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
7
Dated: September 11, 2017
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
8
9
By
/s/Brian D. Berry
BRIAN D. BERRY
JARED L. PALMER
10
11
Attorneys for Defendant
FLOWERS BAKING CO. OF CALIFORNIA,
LLC
12
13
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
14
15
I attest that I have obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from the other signatories.
16
Dated: September 11, 2017
KELLER GROVER LLP
17
18
By
/s/Eric A. Grover
19
ERIC A. GROVER
ROBERT SPENCER
20
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-00840-JAM-AC
1
ORDER
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
5
6
Dated: September 11, 2017
_/s/ John A. Mendez______________
HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
United States District Court Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-00840-JAM-AC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?