Hardwick v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al.
Filing
29
ORDER adopting in full 26 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/13/18. Defendants' 21 motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the date of this Order to file and serve an amended complaint. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
NICHOLAS KURT HARDWICK,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-0854-TLN-DB
v.
ORDER
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On July 3, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
20
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 26.) Plaintiff has
23
filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 27.)
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 3, 2018, are ADOPTED in full; and
3
2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 21) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is granted thirty
4
(30) days from the date of this Order to file and serve an amended complaint.
5
Dated: September 13, 2018
6
7
8
9
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?