Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/23/2016 APPROVING and ADOPTING 20 Stipulation and Proposed Order; ORDERING the plaintiff to file a Motion for Summary Judgment by 1/27/2017; ORDERING the Commissioner of Social Security to respond to said motion by 4/3/2017. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL, CSBN 230138
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
C. HAY-MIE CHO, CSBN 282259
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 268-5610
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: haymie.cho@ssa.gov
8
9
Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
12
13
) Case No.: 2:16-cv-00860-CMK
)
) ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
MICHELLE A. MARTIN,
14
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
vs.
CAROLYN COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
18
19
20
Having reviewed the Stipulation of the parties and finding good cause, the Court hereby
21
22
23
24
25
26
APPROVES and ADOPTS the parties’ Joint Stipulation to Extend Briefing Schedule as the
Order of this Court. The Court hereby EXTENDS the schedule in this matter as follows:
1.
The deadline for Defendant to file her response to Plaintiff’s motion for summary
judgment is extended thirty (30) days to January 27, 2017.
2.
The deadline for Plaintiff to file her reply to Defendant’s response is extended
27
28
forty-five (45) days to April 3, 2017.
[Proposed] Order to Extend Briefing Schedule; 2:16-cv-00860-CMK
1
1
2
3.
All other deadlines and scheduling matters set forth in the Court’s Scheduling
Order dated June 2, 2016, remain the same.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
Dated: December 23, 2016
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Order to Extend Briefing Schedule; 2:16-cv-00860-CMK
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?