Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 21

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/23/2016 APPROVING and ADOPTING 20 Stipulation and Proposed Order; ORDERING the plaintiff to file a Motion for Summary Judgment by 1/27/2017; ORDERING the Commissioner of Social Security to respond to said motion by 4/3/2017. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL, CSBN 230138 Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration C. HAY-MIE CHO, CSBN 282259 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 268-5610 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: haymie.cho@ssa.gov 8 9 Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 ) Case No.: 2:16-cv-00860-CMK ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MICHELLE A. MARTIN, 14 Plaintiff, 15 16 17 vs. CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 18 19 20 Having reviewed the Stipulation of the parties and finding good cause, the Court hereby 21 22 23 24 25 26 APPROVES and ADOPTS the parties’ Joint Stipulation to Extend Briefing Schedule as the Order of this Court. The Court hereby EXTENDS the schedule in this matter as follows: 1. The deadline for Defendant to file her response to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is extended thirty (30) days to January 27, 2017. 2. The deadline for Plaintiff to file her reply to Defendant’s response is extended 27 28 forty-five (45) days to April 3, 2017. [Proposed] Order to Extend Briefing Schedule; 2:16-cv-00860-CMK 1 1 2 3. All other deadlines and scheduling matters set forth in the Court’s Scheduling Order dated June 2, 2016, remain the same. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 Dated: December 23, 2016 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] Order to Extend Briefing Schedule; 2:16-cv-00860-CMK 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?