Fonseca v. Kaiser Permanente Medical Center Roseville, et al.

Filing 63

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 06/22/16 ordering that defendant Smith's time to serve and file a response to plaintiff's amended complaint for declaratory relief in the above entitled action be extended from 6/21/16 to 7/05/16 pursuant to Local Rule 144(a). (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
ISMAEL A. CASTRO
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
ASHANTE L. NORTON
Deputy Attorney General
State Bar No. 203836
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant Karen Smith, M.D., in
her official capacity as Director of the California
Department of Public Health

9
10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

13
14
15

JONEE FONSECA, AN INDIVIDUAL
PARENT AND GUARDIAN OF ISRAEL
STINSON, A MINOR, PLAINTIFF,

16
17
v.

Case No. 2:16-cv-00889-KJM-EFB

FURTHER STIPULATION EXTENDING
TIME TO RESPOND TO THE
Plaintiff, AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR
DECLARATORY RELIEF AND ORDER
THEREON

18
[L.R. 144(a)]
19
20
21
22
23

KAISER PERMANENTE MEDICAL
CENTER ROSEVILLE; DR. MICHAEL
MYETTE M.D.; KAREN SMITH, M.D. IN
HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS
DIRECTOR OF THE CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH;
AND DOES 2 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE,
Defendants. Judge:

The Honorable Kimberly J.
Mueller

24
Action Filed: May 9, 2016
25
26

Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), Plaintiff Jonee Fonseca and Defendant Karen Smith, M.D.,

27

in her official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health (Director), by

28

and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to grant Defendant Karen Smith, M.D. in
1
Further Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to the Amended Complaint for Declaratory Relief and Order
Thereon (2:16-cv-00889-KJM-EFB)

1

her official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health additional time to

2

respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint for Declaratory Relief, served on May 17, 2016, as

3

follows:

4
5

WHEREAS, the parties previously stipulated to a two-week extension for Defendant Smith
to file a responsive pleading;

6
7

WHEREAS, Defendant Smith desires additional time to prepare and file her responsive
pleadings to this action;

8
9

WHEREAS, Plaintiff is willing to provide additional time for Defendant Smith to prepare
and file her responsive pleadings;

10
11

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has also stated her intention to amend the operative complaint in this
action;

12
13

NOW, THEREFORE, BASED ON THE FOREGOING FACTS, THE PARTIES HEREBY
STIPULATE THAT:

14

1.

Defendant Smith’s last day to file her response to the Amended Complaint for

15

Declaratory Relief on file in this matter is further extended from the original stipulated

16

date of June 21, 2016, up to and including July 5, 2016.

17

///

18

///

19

///

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Further Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to the Amended Complaint for Declaratory Relief and Order
Thereon (2:16-cv-00889-KJM-EFB)

1

2.

Should Plaintiff amend her Complaint, defendant Smith will have the usual time to

2

respond as dictated by the federal rules of civil procedure, or further stipulation and/or

3

order of the Court.

4
5

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.
Dated: June 20, 2016

Respectfully Submitted,

6

KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
ISMAEL A. CASTRO
Supervising Deputy Attorney General

7
8

/s/ Ashante L. Norton

9

ASHANTE L. NORTON
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendant
Karen Smith, M.D.
Respectfully Submitted,

10
11
12

Dated: June 20, 2016

13

Pacific Justice Institute

14

/s/ Kevin T. Snider

15

KEVIN T. SNIDER
Chief Counsel
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Jonee Fonseca

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

Further Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to the Amended Complaint for Declaratory Relief and Order
Thereon (2:16-cv-00889-KJM-EFB)

1
2

ORDER THEREON
Based on the Parties’ above Joint Stipulation, IT IS HEREBY SO ORDERED THAT the

3

Defendant Smith’s time to serve and file a response to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint for

4

Declaratory Relief in the above entitled action be extended from June 21, 2016 to July 5, 2016

5

pursuant to Local Rule 144(a).

6

DATED: June 22, 2016

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Further Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to the Amended Complaint for Declaratory Relief and Order
Thereon (2:16-cv-00889-KJM-EFB)