Fonseca v. Kaiser Permanente Medical Center Roseville, et al.
Filing
66
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/19/2016 ORDERING Defendant Karen Smith to respond to the #64 Second Amended Complaint by 8/31/2016. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
ISMAEL A. CASTRO
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
ASHANTE L. NORTON
Deputy Attorney General
State Bar No. 203836
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: (916) 322-2197
Fax: (916) 324-5567
E-mail: Ashante.Norton@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendant Karen Smith, M.D., in
her official capacity as Director of the California
Department of Public Health
9
10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
13
14
15
JONEE FONSECA, AN INDIVIDUAL
PARENT AND GUARDIAN OF ISRAEL
STINSON, A MINOR, PLAINTIFF,
16
17
v.
Case No. 2:16-cv-00889-KJM-EFB
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO THE SECOND
Plaintiff, AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR
DECLARATORY RELIEF AND ORDER
THEREON
18
[L.R. 144(a)]
19
20
21
22
23
KAISER PERMANENTE MEDICAL
CENTER ROSEVILLE; DR. MICHAEL
MYETTE M.D.; KAREN SMITH, M.D. IN
HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS
DIRECTOR OF THE CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH;
AND DOES 2 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE,
Defendants. Judge:
The Honorable Kimberly J.
Mueller
24
Action Filed: May 9, 2016
25
26
Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), Plaintiff Jonee Fonseca and Defendant Karen Smith, M.D.,
27
in her official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health, by and through
28
their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to grant Defendant Karen Smith, M.D. in her official
1
Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to the Second Amended Complaint for Declaratory Relief and Order
Thereon (2:16-cv-00889-KJM-EFB)
1
capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health additional time to respond to
2
Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint for Declaratory Relief, served on July 1, 2016, as follows:
3
WHEREAS, the Second Amended Complaint states claims and issues not raised in the prior
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
complaints;
WHEREAS, Defendant Smith desires additional time to prepare and file her responsive
pleadings to this action;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff is willing to provide additional time for Defendant Smith to prepare
and file her responsive pleadings;
WHEREAS, the parties have not previously extended the time to respond to the Second
Amended Complaint;
NOW, THEREFORE, BASED ON THE FOREGOING FACTS, THE PARTIES HEREBY
12
STIPULATE THAT Defendant Smith’s last day to file her response to the Second Amended
13
Complaint for Declaratory Relief on file in this matter is extended from the original due date of
14
July 22, 2016, up to and including August 31, 2016.
15
16
IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.
Dated: July 14, 2016
Respectfully Submitted,
17
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
ISMAEL A. CASTRO
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
18
19
/s/ Ashante L. Norton
20
ASHANTE L. NORTON
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendant
Karen Smith, M.D.
Respectfully Submitted,
21
22
23
Dated: July 14, 2016
24
Pacific Justice Institute
25
/s/ Kevin T. Snider
26
KEVIN T. SNIDER
Chief Counsel
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Jonee Fonseca
27
28
2
Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to the Second Amended Complaint for Declaratory Relief and Order
Thereon (2:16-cv-00889-KJM-EFB)
1
2
ORDER THEREON
Based on the Parties’ above Joint Stipulation, IT IS HEREBY SO ORDERED THAT
3
Defendant Smith’s time to serve and file a response to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint for
4
Declaratory Relief in the above entitled action be extended from July 22, 2016 to August 31,
5
2016 pursuant to Local Rule 144(a).
6
DATE: July 19, 2016
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to the Second Amended Complaint for Declaratory Relief and Order
Thereon (2:16-cv-00889-KJM-EFB)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?